A Closer look at Steins;Gate or How I am Mad Scientist, it’s so cool

This article contains heavy spoilers to the show, Steins;Gate, so be forewarned when you read this article.

Now let me start off by saying that I really enjoyed Steins;Gate. Probably is one of my favorite shows of the year so far. I feel almost obligated to say this as I find it’s extremely exhausting/frustrating/obnoxious to see fanboys flip their shit over criticism on their favorite shows. I’ve read and written enough articles to know this. Without further adieu, I feel prompted to address some issues I’ve noticed with Steins;Gate. Don’t get me wrong though. S;G had great writing, well thought out and interesting characters, more notable than some of the ones in other popular shows released earlier this year. But with a series like Steins;Gate, there’s some risky business with its ideas.

Being a show with timetraveling elements, it makes jumps and bounds onto complex ideas. Time traveling, or in S;G’s case, timeline alternation,  in any kind of form of story writing, can be difficult to properly write about. The ideas of time traveling can be more complicated than a 16 x 16 x 16 rubix cube, not to mention no one is really sure how it works. However, looking at Steins;Gate logically, there’s quite a number of inconsistencies with its ideals. Of course, we’ll accept that the characters simply have a machine capable of sending messages back into the past. How it’s capable of working, we’re not entirely sure, but that’s besides the point. The cast of Steins;Gate are able to bend the timeline by sending text messages into the past. However, not everything is in accordance with their expectations. Let’s go back to the early episodes when the characters find out that they can seriously change shit around. One simple text message, drastically changes the outcome of the present. Or by the common name of this phenomenon, the butterfly effect.

Among the first things the characters do with this nifty little device, is send winning numbers of the lottery to Okabe in the past. As the present immediately changes, only Okabe has a recollection of the events in the previous timeline. Why only him? Because he’s the key to Steins;Gate as everyone sees later on. Ok fine, he’s John Conner, but that doesn’t necessarily make him God. He’s not capable of controlling fate in any way he wants. About halfway into the series, it’s discovered that Mayuri’s fate is death. Okabe is only capable of delaying it, by simply reversing the d-mails of other people. Even so, her fate is inevitable. The way it’s set up is just as about right as I’d expect. It’s just like the beginning of the Time Machine (2002) movie, where no matter how many times the main character goes back into time to prevent the death of a loved one, the same fate cannot be avoided. One death is replaced by another. Or it can be seen in the time traveling movies like The Terminator, where no matter how many times John Conner and his mother, try to prevent the apocalyptic future, the same results are inevitable, and so the war on machines does occur, just as expected. It seems the law generally agreed upon when it comes to time travel, is that things will always find a way to come to the same result, no matter what.

Making science cool since 2010

But this brings me back to my main point at how contradicting Steins;Gate can be with itself. Mayuri can be “saved”, but only in a timeline where her fate isn’t death at all. However, Kurisu’s fate is death is the first, or Alpha timeline, as the viewers can recall from the first episode. Kurisu died from a stabbing, as seen by our main protagonist, as he had seen her motionless body over a pool of blood. The  way they resolve this in the series is that they simply fake her death by tazing and leaving her over a pool of Okabe’s own blood. Very touching, isn’t it? The way they solve this is a loophole in the timeline, where she doesn’t necessarily have to die, due to Okabe never actually seeing how she dies. Mayuri’s fate couldn’t be avoided because Okabe witnessed before his eyes. Of course, the creators play it out safely, allowing her to live in both timelines, for the sake of a happy ending. Okabe gets what he wants, and everything is peaches and cream. Somehow, it’s a little disappointing. The ending was nice, but it was just that. Just nice. I feel like there’s some great sacrifice to be made here. Yeah Okabe risked his own life, but he’s fine and dandy later on as we see in the epilogue. It’s kinda bullshit. The way Okabe can simply open up a new dimension to “make things right”, feels like he gets too many chances to do what he wants.

Now I’m going to go on a limb here and say the most logical way they could’ve gone about it, is if Okabe had to make the big decision to choose between saving the life of one person over another. Hell, that would really spice things up. The way that set it up in the show is that in Timeline A, Kurisu dies, Mayuri lives, and in Timeline B, the timeline most of the show takes place in, Mayuri dies, and Kurisu lives. I can see that the writers went with erasing all of those three weeks, for the sake of emotional appeal, but it just boils down to making the right decision, not giving everything what everyone wants. I thought it was absolutely great how Mayuri, a character everyone loved so much, is killed out of nowhere. It’s daring and risky, but ultimately works. Seeing Okabe make such a difficult decision would’ve blown this show up to being a masterpiece, in my opinion.The fact that they centered the result on setting the Okabe in the past to seeing a bloodied Kurisu, feels like they’re cheesing their way out of this sticky situation.

But he's a dude...

The whole situation with WW3 is a bit of a stretch, well…  a long stretch. Yeah, millions of lives are at stake, but in the end, the most important things are the people the main character is close with. Between a childhood friend, and a lover, it would’ve driven the audience insane how Okabe would try to handle the situation. Personally, I think Mayuri should’ve been the one to go. True, it would’ve been a huge waste of effort from all those times Okabe time jumped, reversing all the d-mails to delay her death. But coming to terms with her fate, would’ve felt much more emotionally impactful. Yeah it would be tough dealing with the death of a very likable character, but somehow I feel it’s for the best.

Aside from those inconsistencies, there were a few other things that rubbed me the wrong way as well. As Okabe jumps back and forth through timelines, some of characters will make some mention about how things used to be certain way, as if they have some memory from the other timelines. Here’s whats wrong with this. It’s a very different timeline than they’re in, not to mention they didn’t have any recollection about meeting people that they’ve met before in another timeline. For example, the way Mayuri notes in the first timeline how it felt like Kurisu used to sit in the computer chair in the office, despite never having met her. It’s odd the way they go about saying things like this. It leaves implications that one timeline is “incorrect”which isn’t necessarily true. Suppose a set of events were meant to occur for the sake of others . It’s rather difficult to say which is suppose to happen in either timelines. The first timeline is where Kurisu dies and WW3 occurs as a result. Would it have occurred anyway in the second timeline where she lives? It’s all speculation at this point, but I wouldn’t rule out the possibility.

This is how mad scientists dance.

I wouldn’t be making these ‘nitpicks’ at the show if it decided to be a little more silly than that, but for a show like Steins;Gate, it dared to go on and make use of some very complex ideas. It’s great that they’re took risks like that, but like I stated earlier, it can present some logical inconsistencies. Anyone could just say, “Well that’s anime for you,  it doesn’t have to make complete sense, only entertaining.” I just can’t help but consider the imperfections of Steins;Gate, for all that it’s worth to be such a thought-provoking show. Regardless though, Steins;Gate is a great show, one of the best I’ve seen this year.

I will say though, the last bit of the ending where Okabe and Kurisu cross paths with one another was a nice touch. It’s nice to see that fate will always bring those two together. It is pretty similar to the ending of the movie, The Butterfly Effect, so it’s not exactly original, but it works. Fate is just among those phenomenon we’ll never really understand completely, just like the butterfly effect. Somehow things just have a way of working themselves out.

Advertisements

About davethezombie
I watch anime on nearly a daily basis. I also try to read some manga every now and then.

15 Responses to A Closer look at Steins;Gate or How I am Mad Scientist, it’s so cool

  1. vp says:

    It was never proved, nor stated, that Makise’s death was inevitable in the Beta time line, was it? He only tried to save her once.

    • Actually it was stated that she does in fact, die in the Beta. Acknowledged by the other side characters in the story. Anyhow, I’ve already come to the conclusion S;G just “cheats the system” by Okabe moving to a timeline where neither of his friends die.

  2. Stein says:

    Should play the visual novel, it’s clear the turmoil he goes through to make the choices there, some scenes are just heartbreaking

  3. Pet says:

    i think steins;gate has no “happy ending” just because he saved both Mayuri and Kurisu: Okabe is eternally a victim of a trade-off world. actually, in order to go on the steins;gate timeline where everyone is alive, he must accept a very diffiucult condition, the one which lead Kurisu to forget him and all the time they spent together.
    so, it simply do not exists a timeline where everything is peache and cream. Okabe sacrifice himself choosing the “better but no perfect” timeline.

  4. Nuff says:

    Warning slowpoke is here! But i feel like i should leave comment.
    Article is great(effort), but I’d say criticise anime, based on visual novel about anything, but how it was interpreted a bit off. I’m badly recommend you to play VN, if you didn’t do so yet, i think that,might help(if you’re still interested).

  5. Zeyami says:

    I feel like you’re too hellbent on Kurisu actually being dead in the original timeline. According to the show, it was Okabe who stabbed her, but since that itself was an altered timeline the real question that makes this an inconsistency is why did he have to go back if she was never really dead? Would saying no have actually caused the timeline to alter to Steins Gate right then and there?

    • Zeyami says:

      Just realized actually. He has to go back, kill her, then go back and fake it because without Okabe sending that text message, supposedly it would force the world into the timeline where WW3 occurs regardless of whether or not she dies, because there would be noone to replace the metal upa.

      And that paragraph is exactly why time-travel is too damned complex for stories.

  6. Adding my grain of salt… why do people remember prexisting event in other timelines ?
    2 things.
    First. EVERYONE is able to recall to some degree other timelines. Thats why Deja Vu and Jamais Vu exist in the first place. Its only that Okabe seems to have a stronger degree of this hability that most people. Its stated in the game, maybe its not so clear in the anime, but thats the whole idea. That not even Okabe is that special to begin with.
    Second. In this game they play with the physics concept of observed events vs those unknown. Japanese just love Schrödinger’s cat way too much. Basically unless someone watches an event unfold, every possible outcome can occur. In Kurisu´s case Okabe “watched” someone in a pool of blood. Since that event was already “set in stone” future Okabe needed to reharse it in order to “fool” time. Something similar happens in the Infinity visual novel series by Kid.

  7. Gate closer says:

    I can not see this. But after reading this article and start to watching.

  8. Jesus, so close close to deleting this blog post altogether because A) No one here seems to understand my point and B) This blog post is old as fuck. Wish people would move the fuck on.

  9. Ciao says:

    I disagree on a lot of ideas you’ve written. This is a time travel story. Hence, you should expect inconsistencies. In real life, no one could fully conceptualize and explain time travelling BUT this game successfully manage to pull off a great job by setting limitations. Steins;Gate is 90% MORE CONSISTENT and CLEAR than any previous time travel movies/shows I’ve seen. It doesn’t leave you the idea-“WTF has just happened?”

    IMO, this article is better than yours: http://kotaku.com/steins-gate-might-be-the-best-anime-i-have-ever-seen-476397964

    Ciao

    • That’s fine if you disagree. I still think steins;gate has stupid fucking logic about time travel and expects its audience not to think about it. But if you don’t see it the way I do, that’s fine. Also, I could hardly care about what Kotaku thinks, considering they praised some pretty awful shows like SAO.

  10. ari says:

    Now everyone should see the movie that present the sequel of the anime series, it explains and answer many questions such as why the others characters seem to remember some slices of other timelines and I think prove how the stein gate line is not the perfect end…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: